And the timing of the said updates couldnt have actually been much better as it faces a powerful obstacle from a brand-new 150cc Pulsar, one that is Bajajs best yet.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: style and featuresWith the motorcycles parked side by side, you wont require a 2nd glance to tell which one is the older bike. Even the Pulsar has a more sporty position than what some might expect, and if you want convenience as a top priority then the single disc P150 comes with a taller, flat handlebar and more easily placed foot pegs.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: engine and fuel efficiencyTVS efficiency is better, but vibrations are an issue.The Apache has the advantage on paper, be it in its engines power and torque outputs or its lower kerb weight, which is handy when you pit it versus the clock. These vibrations are the clearest indication of how old this Apache is.Performance and fuel efficiencyBajaj Pulsar P150TVS Apache RTR 160 2VACCELERATION0-60kph6.33 s4.8s0-100kph21.13 s17.37sROLL-ON ACCELERATION20-50kph (2nd gear) 3.37s3.05s30-70kph (3rd gear) 6.34s5.88s50-80kph (4th gear) 6.76s6.37sBRAKING60-0kph16.90 m19.76 mFUEL EFFICIENCYCity43.41 kpl53.1 kpl (Urban)/ 48.5 kpl (Sport) Highway48kpl46.44 kpl (Sport) In complete contrast, the Pulsars engine is beautifully refined, no matter where the rev needle is sitting at. In comparison, the Pulsar only managed 43.41 kpl in the city environment and 48kpl on the open highway.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: ride and handlingThe Apache is constantly up for antics such as these.The Apaches compact dimensions and smaller sized wheelbase make it an incredibly efficient tool to cut in and out of traffic. With its price tag of Rs 1.16 lakh-1.19 lakh serving as the cherry on top, the Pulsar P150 emerged as our clear winner.SpecificationsBajaj Pulsar P150TVS Apache RTR 160 2VRating8/107/10Price (ex-showroom, Delhi) Rs 1.16 lakh-1.19 lakhRs 1.17 lakh-1.24 lakhEngine149.68 cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled159.7 cc, single-cylinder, air-cooledPower14.5 hp at 8500rpm16.04 hp at 8750rpmTorque13.5 Nm at 6000rpm13.85 Nm at 7000rpmPower to weight103.57 hp/tonne116.23 hp/tonneWheelbase1352mm1300mmKerb weight140kg138kgSeat height790mm790mmFuel tank14 litres12 litresFront suspensionTelescopic forkTelescopic forkRear suspensionMonoshockTwin shock absorbersFront brake260mm disc270mm discRear brake230mm disc200mm discTyre size (front) 90/90-1790/ 90-17Tyre size (back) 110/80 -17120/ 70-17.

The just recently updated TVS Apache RTR 160 2V continues to offer in huge numbers despite its age. We find out if it can stand up to the brand new Bajaj Pulsar P150s challenge.To see two great rivals sparring has always led to a fascinating turn of events, no? Whether it was Rossi vs Marquez, Niki Lauda vs James Hunt, or even motorcycle business like TVS and Bajaj. These 2 Indian makers have actually been at it in the 150cc-160cc area for years. For TVS, the Apache RTR 160 2V, in spite of being around for near to two years, offers in numbers huge enough to necessitate a thorough upgrade. And the timing of the stated updates couldnt have been better as it faces a powerful obstacle from a brand-new 150cc Pulsar, one that is Bajajs best yet.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: style and featuresWith the motorbikes parked side by side, you will not need a 2nd glance to inform which one is the older bike. The Apaches style has mainly remained unchanged, conserve for the brand-new colours and graphics. This, together with the new LED headlight (that does a great job of illuminating a dark roadway) along with the LED tail-light do their bit to uplift the look of the Apache. Personally, I like the way the TVS looks and a bulk of people in the group agree.P150s LED projector uses good throw and spread.Shift your gaze to the Pulsar P150 and there are strong influences of its older siblings, the N160 and N250 in its style. Thats not a bad thing and I believe that the sleeker body panels of the new-age Pulsars look nice. What doesnt look great, particularly when it comes to the P150, is the spindly fork and the skinny tyres. The sense of mass and percentage is doing not have, the kind that weve seen in previous Pulsars.The TVS likewise exceeds Bajaj in the whos got the much better features contest. With a full-digital display that gets Bluetooth connectivity, turn-by-turn navigation, and more, it is a great deal more in-depth than the Pulsars simpler, yet trendy analogue-digital system. If that wasnt enough, the TVS possesses flight modes– Rain, Urban and Sport. These modes temper the power delivery in addition to the peak outputs. In Sport mode, for instance, the peak power and torque are 16.04 hp at 8,750 rpm and 13.85 Nm at 7,000 rpm. Whereas in Urban/Rain mode, these figures drop to 13.32 hp at 8,000 rpm and 12.7 Nm at 6,500 rpm. Trip modes in a 160cc bike may appear worthless to some, however, throughout the test, the advantages were obvious and well get to that a little later. In the meantime, the Apache is plainly leading, and theres another location where it stays unbeaten.TVS cluster more modern-day with Bluetooth connectivity.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: ergonomicsHopping on the Apache, it is obvious that the company designed the bike for kid racers and not well-fed individuals or high riders. The foot pegs are rear and fairly high set, the clip-ons are pulled more inwards than on the Pulsar and your knees nasty with the fuel tank extension resulting in a cramped riding posture. Move to the Pulsar and its accommodating seat as well as its less committed riding posture makes it far more comfortable for day-to-day commutes. But even the Pulsar has a more sporty position than what some might anticipate, and if you desire convenience as a priority then the single disc P150 features a taller, flat handlebar and more easily placed foot pegs.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: engine and fuel efficiencyTVS performance is much better, however vibrations are an issue.The Apache has the benefit on paper, be it in its engines power and torque outputs or its lower kerb weight, which is useful when you pit it against the clock. Whether its the run from 60kph, 100kph or 80kph from dead stop, the TVS is substantially quicker than the brand-new Pulsar. It is over two seconds faster than the Pulsar to cross 100kph. Clearly then, there is no contest when it concerns performance, and Im genuinely impressed with how quick the old TVS is. What didnt impress me or anyone in the team was the quantity of vibrations one feels in the mid to upper reaches of the rev variety. It feels a little too severe for this day and age, and leaves you with a tingling experience in the hands and feet. These vibrations are the clearest indication of how old this Apache is.Performance and fuel efficiencyBajaj Pulsar P150TVS Apache RTR 160 2VACCELERATION0-60kph6.33 s4.8s0-100kph21.13 s17.37sROLL-ON ACCELERATION20-50kph (2nd equipment) 3.37s3.05s30-70kph (3rd gear) 6.34s5.88s50-80kph (4th gear) 6.76s6.37sBRAKING60-0kph16.90 m19.76 mFUEL EFFICIENCYCity43.41 kpl53.1 kpl (Urban)/ 48.5 kpl (Sport) Highway48kpl46.44 kpl (Sport) In total contrast, the Pulsars engine is wonderfully improved, no matter where the rev needle is sitting at. It is likewise a super tractable engine, and there were times I might ride slackly at 5-6kph in second equipment without a hiccup. Pulling a fast overtake while riding in stated way just needed a twist of the throttle. Needless to say, first equipment was barely hired even while riding in Mumbais horrendous traffic. Travelling with this engine is a pleasure.Pulsars engine is remarkably fine-tuned and tractable.The Apaches engine is likewise quite tractable, however what came as a pleasant surprise is the kind of fuel performance it uses. Riding the bike in Sport mode, the TVS returned 46.44 kpl on the highway and 48.5 kpl in the city. Switching to Urban mode raised the fuel economy in the city to 53.1 kpl, which is rather outstanding. In contrast, the Pulsar just managed 43.41 kpl in the urban environment and 48kpl on the open highway.Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: ride and handlingThe Apache is always up for shenanigans such as these.The Apaches compact measurements and smaller sized wheelbase make it a very reliable tool to cut in and out of traffic. I loved its extremely flickable handling, and it was a comparable story when I rode the bike through a set of corners. The bikes Remora tyres, with their grip and feedback likewise helped enhance self-confidence in the bike. On the other side, the TVS short wheelbase does make the bike twitch a little over bumpy highways at triple-digit speeds and high-speed stability is not a strong point. The Pulsar, meanwhile, at similar speeds and roadways, feels far more planted and confident– its longer wheelbase assists matters. And, in what is a huge departure from previous Pulsar 150s, the P150 is significantly simpler to snap in and out of corners and its handling has enhanced considerably. It isnt as amusing as the TVS, but it is close.Where the Bajaj steals another important point from the TVS is in the uncomplicated method it straighten out bumps and holes. The Apaches ride quality is decent, but the front end was rather soft, to the point where it bottoms out when hitting sharp-edged bumps or aggressive speed breakers. The Pulsar likewise has a better braking system, both in terms of bite as well as feedback from the lever.The P150 is significantly much easier to snap in and out of corners compared to the previous Pulsar 150. Bajaj Pulsar P150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 2V: verdictThe Apache RTR 160 2V, despite being such an old bike, still handles to plaster a grin on individualss faces, consisting of mine. I believe an important factor for it is that it is one of the fastest, most nimble bikes in the segment. It also beats the Pulsar P150 when it pertains to efficiency, features and more importantly, fuel economy. As good as it is, there are a couple of things about the Apache that make it difficult to recommend.At a starting rate of Rs 1.17 lakh, going up to Rs 1.24 lakh for the top-end version weve got on test, it sits rather close to the Apache RTR 160 4V thats priced in between Rs 1.21 lakh-1.30 lakh. Since its what the market wants, the 4V is a vastly remarkable motorbike in terms of convenience, dynamics.you and improvement cant truly blame TVS for keeping this bike alive. However put the Pulsar P150 in the picture, and you cant shake the sensation that the Apache is dated regardless of the styling refresh and features. To contribute to that, the Pulsars exceptional engine improvement, more impressive chassis and convenience levels make it the better bike to ride in almost every situation. With its cost tag of Rs 1.16 lakh-1.19 lakh acting as the cherry on top, the Pulsar P150 became our clear winner.SpecificationsBajaj Pulsar P150TVS Apache RTR 160 2VRating8/107/10Price (ex-showroom, Delhi) Rs 1.16 lakh-1.19 lakhRs 1.17 lakh-1.24 lakhEngine149.68 cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled159.7 cc, single-cylinder, air-cooledPower14.5 hp at 8500rpm16.04 hp at 8750rpmTorque13.5 Nm at 6000rpm13.85 Nm at 7000rpmPower to weight103.57 hp/tonne116.23 hp/tonneWheelbase1352mm1300mmKerb weight140kg138kgSeat height790mm790mmFuel tank14 litres12 litresFront suspensionTelescopic forkTelescopic forkRear suspensionMonoshockTwin shock absorbersFront brake260mm disc270mm discRear brake230mm disc200mm discTyre size (front) 90/90-1790/ 90-17Tyre size (back) 110/80 -17120/ 70-17.